How to Protect Yourself from a Family Member Who Tries to Take Advantage of You

It is with great disappointment that we must report that Tan Lee Hoon was convicted on seven assault charges involving her domestic helpers in December 2022.

The judge presiding over the case was unequivocal in his statement before sentencing: “All maids should be treated with dignity and respect.” Tan’s conviction serves as a reminder that the rights of domestic workers must be taken seriously, and that there are consequences for failing to do so.

The details of the case are as follows: Tan and her brother Jia Cheng had gotten Koo, one of their domestic workers, to help break open a safe that had been placed inside an IKEA bag.

1. What did Tan Lee Hoon do that resulted in her conviction of seven assault charges?

Tan Lee Hoon, who was recently convicted of seven assault charges, was found to have been engaging in a scheme of theft from her own family. The scheme entailed enlisting the help of her boyfriend and his twin, and the trio proceeded to break into her family’s home and steal a variety of items. Hoon faced a variety of charges for her involvement in the case and for her role in the thefts. The charges included two counts of housebreaking, two counts of criminal trespass, two counts of theft, and one count of attempted theft. Hoon was ultimately given a sentence of probation, which included restrictions on her ability to contact her boyfriend and his twin, as well as an order to pay restitution to her family.

2. What did Tan do with her brother’s safe before taking all the piggy banks in the house?

Tan’s actions, as reported in the news, involved a particularly calculated and complex plan of theft. She enlisted the help of both her boyfriend and his twin brother to break into her family’s house and steal from them. Before taking all of the piggy banks in the house, Tan first accessed her brother’s safe, which she had the combination for. She then emptied the safe and removed the piggy banks, which were filled with cash and jewelry. The trio then escaped the scene with their stolen items, only to be apprehended by police shortly thereafter. Tan’s actions demonstrate a clear callous disregard for the safety of her family and a willingness to take advantage of her brother’s trust in her.

3. What did Jia Cheng and Tan enlist Koo to do in order to open the safe?

Jia Cheng and Tan enlisted Koo to help them open the safe in order to steal from Jia Cheng’s family. Koo, being an experienced locksmith, was able to use her expertise to manipulate the combination lock on the safe, allowing the trio to gain access to the possessions within. While the details of Koo’s exact methodology remains unclear, it is believed that she used a combination of her lockpicking skills and her knowledge of the safe’s inner workings to gain access, showing her proficiency in the craft. In the end, her actions enabled the trio to successfully breach the safe, thus allowing them to commit the crime.

4. What did the judge say about treating maids with dignity and respect before sentencing Tan?

The judge presiding over the case of the woman who got her boyfriend and his twin to help her steal from her family stated that she should have treated the maids of the family with dignity and respect before sentencing her. The judge highlighted the importance of treating others with respect and dignity, regardless of their role in society, and that failing to do so has consequences. The judge noted that this case was a reminder of the need to treat other people with respect and that any actions taken to the contrary should be taken seriously. Furthermore, he noted that the act of stealing from her family was a serious crime and that the woman should have taken into consideration the feelings of the family and the maids before she committed such an act.

Quick Summary

In conclusion, the women’s act of abusing two domestic helpers and her enlistment of her boyfriend and his twin to steal S$57,000 worth of items from her own family are heinous offenses that cannot be condoned. Society should hold individuals accountable for their actions so that similar acts can be avoided in the future. Therefore, the court ruling of 10 months’ jail for one offense and probation with 60 hours of community service for the other was a valid decision that showed accountability while also recognizing that Tiffany Tan Hwee Shuan has shown signs of remorse.